Hello everyone in today's video. We're going to see the most common duplication process. Researchers are going through while they are trying to publish the latest experiment. But before let me tell you that we're just starting and you series of videos where we're going to talk about the scientific publishing world in this video series. We'll talk about all the different ways that researchers can use to disseminate their studies. We will obviously speak about open access open science and good scientific practices. At some point we will even make a focus on research assessments which is one of the most significant problem. Sciences facing at the moment as we come along with many other issues in the scientific system we will probably speak about it and we might even start with publication bias in the meantime. I hope you will enjoy this video. And if it is the case well you can support us by subscribing to our Channel and hit the belt stay tuned for the upcoming videos. Besides you can leave a comment and tell us if there is a particular centric topic that you would like us to speak about but first let's dig into the most common application process. Researchers are going through when they want to publish their results it mostly starts with an idea turning to experiments then researchers write the report and try to find the best job within the research field. There are many options available in many criterion which guide researchers choice for particular journal once chosen the researchers can edit and change their manuscripts in regard to the journal guidelines. And believe me it can be tough sometime once. Everything is ready researchers off to upload the manuscript with a cover letter during the submission process. The journal won't might be fast but always take longer than expected an editor. We didn't assess whether the manuscripts deserve to get a chance for publication if not researchers are back to square one and consider when we searched submit their work to a journal.

They consented somewhere else at the same time so they might lose a lot of time there. If it's their lucky day they might get in and move to the next step clear as we keeping this a spin reveal is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies are the Predators of the work. It helps the leader to decide whether the work should be rejected accepted with major revisions or minor revisions so depending on the reviews and the editors decision researchers can go back to square one again. But let's imagine the best scenario they only got minor revisions and can move on to the next step. A discussion is therefore implemented by the editorial between the believers and the archers who are supposedly anonymous that state the researchers are to answer the reviewers and editors queries in due time review might take a lot of time but probably up to improve and control the scientific quality of study once all queries have been answered and the new versions of the manuscript has been pulled by all parts. The article is almost ready for publication at this stage researchers after make a choice either give their water rights to the publisher so that they can sell it to the University where the others all the researchers are actually working. Oh pay an average $1500 to make it accessible to everyone. The article is then in open access in today's scientific publishing world more than 33,000 journals of publishing one million and a half scientific articles per year. The problem is that 72% of the journals are still blocking access to the research and therefore talk progress in science and this is actually the topic of our next video so stay tuned you.